Back in my
B.K. era (Before Kim), I went shopping for shoes at a K-Mart. I tried one on
and it fit OK, and it was inexpensive, so I put it in the box, paid for it, and
went home. The next morning, I discovered that I’d purchased two right shoes.
“That’s OK,” I figured. “I can find a way to make this work.”
I subscribe
to targeted shopping. I know what I want, I find it as quickly as possible, and
then I can leave the store. Kim, and I suspect many women, has a different
shopping experience. She makes comparisons between similar products, evaluating
them. She might go to more than one store. She may decline what a salesperson
suggests, as she did yesterday with a salad-spinner at Williams-Sonoma. (I have
never rejected a salad-spinner in my life.) She may even try on both shoes
before purchasing them.
Now, Kim is
not a person who simply enjoys shopping as a social experience – going out with
The Girls for a day. And it’s not an aesthetic experience where you get a lift
looking at beautiful clothes, furniture, or salad spinners. Kim’s usually too
busy looking after me to shop just for the pleasure of it. No, Kim usually
shops for stuff she needs, or we need, but it’s her commitment to something she
calls “quality” that takes her a bit longer than it takes me. She does not shop
for shoes at K-Mart.
Some
history:
When we got
married, Kim took a long look at the clothes in my closet and made me an offer:
For every three shirts that she threw away, she would buy me a new one. I was
puzzled, but I accepted the offer.
She later
told me about an incident when we were courting. Wearing an apparently
memorable bright yellow shirt and a brown and yellow argyle sleeveless sweater,
I approached her desk at the school where we both worked. She told me she thought
it was a clever joke I was pulling, testing for her response. I’m not sure she
believes, even today, that I had no such intention – that was just what I chose
to wear. It may go back to my first marriage, when I had to leave for work
early while my wife was still asleep, so I would dress in the dark. Some days I
would be surprised to discover what I had “chosen.” This is why I put Kim’s
word “quality” in quotation marks. (I later offered Kim’s son, Scott, $50 if he
would wear the shirt and sweater out the door. Broke at the time, he declined
my offer. The outfit was last seen in the Ripley’s Believe It or Not Museum
somewhere in Florida.)
Our friend
Alice advised that in choosing an outfit you don’t want to be “all
matchy-matchy.” I was delighted to realize that my fashion sense is
cutting-edge. I’m pleased when I discover that my socks match.
It’s
important to keep your primary goal in mind when you are shopping. For Kim,
it’s a quality product that meets a specific need – boots to wear in the city
in the winter, jeans that fit, look good, and will last for a while. Similarly,
I try to keep my primary goal in mind: Don’t buy anything. I am not always
successful. Yesterday I told Kim that I needed some black socks. “Yes,” she
said, “I noticed that a couple of pairs had holes in them.”
“Three
pairs had holes.”
“Did you
throw them out?” Kim knows me well.
“Yes,” I
lied. I was wearing one of them.
We left
Macy’s with eight pair of black socks, plus two undershirts that Kim said
appeared to be of higher quality than my graying ones.
Kim is, in
fact, nudging me toward quality. For example, I love the quality of my new
Merrill insulated snow boots. My old boots weren’t waterproof or insulated, and
they were starting to fall apart, so I figured they had a few years left in
them. So Kim found my Merrill boots online and bought them for me.
I do not like shopping for clothes. I try to mix the old with the new. I do have a thing for boots and shoes. I don’t have to buy designer names, but I do like quality. I serve as Jim’s fashion consultant. I have selected wedding outfits for 2 male friends. I have helped a female friend choose an outfit for Clinton’s inaugural ball. Just recently met her husband and he made the comment. “So you’re the one who spent all my money on my wife’s outfit!” Anyway, I agree with quality!
ReplyDelete